TRANSLATOR'S FOREWARD xi
The Internal Connection between Ground-Being-Inception
1§ 1. Elucidation of the title of the lecture “Basic Concepts”
1a) Basic concepts are ground-concepts
3b) The claim of the ground-concepts
3c) The difference of claims upon man
3α) The claim of requirements: Needing
4β) The claim upon the essence of historical man
5d) Readiness for the originary, the incipient, and the “‘knowing better” of historiological consciousness
6e) The meaning of reflection upon the inception of history
8f) The goal of the lecture: Reflection as preparation for confronting the inception of our history
RECAPITULATION
1. Our understanding of “basic concepts” and our relation to them as an anticipatory knowing
112. The decay of knowing in the present age: The decision in favor of the useful over what we can do without
123. The inception as a decision about what is essential in Western history (in modern times: unconditional will and technology)
154. Practicing the relation to what is ‘‘thought-worthy”’ by considering the ground
165. The essential admittance of historical man into the inception, into the ‘‘essence’’ of ground
First Division
21Discussion of the “Is,” of Beings as a Whole
21§2. Beings as a whole are actual, possible, necessary
22§3. Nonconsideration of the essential distinction between being and beings
24§4. The nondiscoverability of the “is”
25§5. The unquestioned character of the “‘is’’ in its grammatical determination—emptiness and richness of meaning
29a) The emptiness and indeterminacy of the “is” as a presupposition for its being a “copula”
30b) Being (“is”) as the general, the universal
31§6. The solution of healthy common sense: Acting and effecting among beings instead of empty thinking about being (workers and soldiers)
34§7. Renouncing being—dealing with beings
RECAPITULATION
1. Consideration of beings as a whole presupposes the essential inclusion of man in the difference between being and beings
382. Wealth and poverty of meaning in the “is”
393. Equating dealing with the actual with considering beings as a whole
404. The unthought residence of man in the distinction between being and beings
Second Division
42Guidewords for Reflection upon Being
42§8. Being is the emptiest and at the same time a surplus
43§9. Being is the most common and at the same time unique
47§10. Being is the most intelligible and at the same time concealment
51§11. Being is the most worn-out and at the same time the origin
52§12. Being is the most reliable and at the same time the non-ground
53§13. Being is the most said and at the same time a keeping silent
54§14. Being is the most forgotten and at the same time remembrance
56§15. Being is the most constraining and at the same time liberation
57§16. Unifying reflection upon being in the sequence of guidewords
RECAPITULATION
Guidewords about Being
1. Being is empty as an abstract concept and at the same time a surplus
592. Being is the most common of all and at the same time uniqueness (The sameness of being and nothing)
643. The meaning of the guidewords: Instructions for reflection upon the difference between being and beings
Third Division
66Being and Man
66§17. The ambivalence of being and the essence of man: What casts itself toward us and is cast away
71§18. The historicality of being and the historically essential abode of man
72§19. Remembrance into the first inception of Western thinking is reflection upon being, is grasping the ground
RECAPITULATION
1. The discordant essence in the relation of man to being: The casting-toward and casting-away of being
782. Remembrance into the first inception is placement into still presencing being, is grasping it as the ground
§20. The conflicting intentions of philological tradition and philosophical translation
83§21. Nietzsche’s and Diels’s renderings of the fragment as the - standard for interpretations current today
RECAPITULATION
The remembering return into the inception of Western thinking—listening to the fragment of Anaximander
§22. Reflection upon the incipient saying of being in the fragment of Anaximander
88a) Suppositions regarding the relation between the two sentences
89b) The saying about being occurs in correspondences: The first sentence thinks being as τό χρεών in correspondence with the inception as threefold enjoinment
92§23. Excursus: Insight into the τό χρεών with the help of another word from Anaximander
92a) The threefold unity of enjoinment (ἀρχή)
94b) Enjoinment (ἀρχή) is repelling (ἄπειρον)
97c) The governance of being as ἀρχή and ἄπειρον in γένεσις and φθορά for the presencing of beings
99d) How does being, which is ἀρχή and ἄπειρον, let beings be?
101§24. The second sentence thinks being in correspondence with its essence as presencing, abiding, time
101a) Being is overcoming the unfit
103b) The connection between being and time
104§25. The relation of both sentences to one another: The fragment as the incipient saying of being
EDITOR'S AFTERWORD 107
GLOSSARY 109