I. The Text of the Lecture on the Basis of Student Writings
|
§3. The Determination of the Concept through the Doctrine of Definition
in Kant’s Logic
|
9 |
|
§4. The Aspects of the Conceptuality of Aristotle’s Basic Concepts and the
Question Concerning Their Indigenous Character
|
11 |
|
§5. Return to the Ground of Definition
|
13 |
|
a) The Predicables
|
|
b) The Aristotelian Determination of ὁρισμός as λόγος οὐσίας
|
|
§6. Preliminary Clarification of λόγος
|
15 |
|
§7. Οὐσία as the Basic Concept of Aristotelian Philosophy
|
17 |
|
a) The Various Types of Conceptual Ambiguity and the Coming to
Be of Terms
|
|
b) The Customary Meaning of Οὐσία
|
|
c) The Terminological Meaning of Οὐσία
|
|
α. Οὐσία as Beings
|
|
β. Οὐσία as Being: Being-Characters (Metaphysics, Δ8).
|
|
γ. Οὐσία as Being-There: Being-Characters as Characters of the There
|
|
§8. Ὁρισμός as Determinate Mode of Being-in-the-World: The Task of
Fully Understanding the Basic Concepts in Their Conceptuality in
Being-There as Being-in-the-World
|
26 |
|
§9. The Being-There of Human Beings as ψυχή: Speaking-Being (λόγον ἔχειν) and Being-with-One-Another (κοινωνία) (Politics A 2, Rhetoric A 6 and 11).
|
32 |
|
a) The Determination of Human Beings as ζῷον λόγον ἔχον: The
Task of Setting λόγος Apart from φωνή
|
|
b) The λόγος of Human Beings and the φωνή of Animals as Peculiar
Modes of Being-in-the-World and of Being-with-One-Another
|
|
α. Orientation toward Phenomena That Lie at the Basis of the
Separating of λόγος from φωνή
|
|
β. The Encounter-Characters of the World of Animals: ἡδύ
and λυπηρόν: Φωνή as Indicating, Enticing, Warning
|
|
γ. The Encounter-Characters of the World of Humans Beings:
συμφέρον, βλαβερὸν, and ἀγαθόν. Λόγος as Self-Expression
with Others about What Is Conducive to the End of Concern
|
|
c) The One (Das Man) as the How of the Everydayness of Being-with-One-Another:
The Equiprimordiality of Being-with-One-Another and Speaking-Being
|
|
§10. The Being-There of Human Beings as ἐνέργεια: The ἀγαθόν (Nicomachean Ethics A 1–4).
|
46 |
|
a) The Explicitness of the ἀγαθόν
|
|
α. The Explicitness of the ἀγαθόν as Such in τέχνη
|
|
β. The Explicitness of the ἀνθρώπινον ἀγαθόν in the πολιτική
|
|
b) The Basic Determinations of the ἀγαθόν
|
|
α. Manifoldness and Guiding Connectedness of the τέλη and Necessity of a τέλος δι' αὐτό
|
|
β. The βίοι as τέλη δι' αὑτά: The Criteria for the τέλος δι'
αὐτό: οἰκεῖον, δυσαφαίρετον, τέλειον, and αὔταρκεςν
|
|
§11. The τέλειον (Metaphysics Δ16)
|
55 |
|
a) Translation of the Chapter
|
|
b) Arrangement of the Chapter
|
|
α. The First Two Points of Arrangement. The Method of Carrying-Over
|
|
β. Presentation of the Context of the Treatment of τέλειον
|
|
γ. Revised Arrangement of the Chapter
|
|
c) The τέλειον as Limit in the Sense of the Genuine There of a Being
|
|
§12. Continuing the Consideration of the ἀγαθόν (Nicomachean Ethics, A 5–6)
|
63 |
|
a) Continuing the Discussion of Basic Determinations of the ἀγαθόν:
The ἀνθρώπινον ἀγαθόν as the ἁπλῶς τέλειον
|
|
b) The ψυχῆς ἐνέργειαι κατ’ ἀρετήν as the Being-Possibility of Human
Beings Which Is Sufficient for the Sense of ἀνθρώπινον ἀγαθόν
|
|
§13. Speaking-Being as Ability-to-Hear and as Possibility of Falling: The Double-Sense of Ἄλογον (Nicomachean Ethics A13; De Anima B4).
|
71 |
|
§14. The Basic Determination of Rhetoric and λόγος Itself as πίστις (Rhetoric Α1–3)
|
78 |
|
a) The Basic Definition of Rhetoric as the Possibility of Seeing
What at Each Moment Speaks for a Matter
|
|
b) The Three πίστεις ἔντεχνοι: ἦθος, πάθος, and λόγος Itself
|
|
c) Λόγος Itself as πίστις
|
|
α. The Three Forms of Hearer and the Three Types of λόγος
to Be Determined from Them: Deliberative Discourse
(συμβουλευτικός), Judicial Discourse (δικανικός), and
Eulogy (ἐπιδεικτικός)
|
|
β. Rhetorical Speaking with παράδειγμα and ἐνθύμημα
as Paralleling Dialectical Speaking with ἐπαγωγή and
συλλογισμός
|
|
§15. Δόξα (Nicomachean Ethics, Ζ10 and Γ4)
|
93 |
|
a) Demarcation of δόξα in Contrast with Seeking (ζήτησις),
Knowing (ἐπιστήμη), and Presenting-Itself (φαντασία)
|
|
b) Making-Present of the Context for the Treatment of δόξα
|
|
c) Repetition and Continuation of the Demarcation of δόξα: δόξα
and Being-Resolved (προαίρεσις)
|
|
d) The Character of δόξα as the Orientedness of Average Being-with-One-Another-in-the-World
|
|
e) Δόξα as the Basis of Theoretical Negotiating
|
|
α. Pre-given (πρότασις) and Project (πρόβλημα) as From-
Which and About-Which of Theoretical Negotiating (Topics
Α4 and Α10–11)
|
|
β. Inability-to-Get-Through (ἀπορία) as the Topic of
Theoretical Negotiating (Metaphysics Β1)
|
|
§16. ἦθος and πάθος as πίστεις (Rhetoric Β1, Nicomachean Ethics Β4)
|
109 |
|
a) Theoretical and Practical Negotiating
|
|
b) ἦθος as πίστις
|
|
c) πάθος as πίστις
|
|
§17. Ἕξις (Metaphysics Δ23 and 20, Nicomachean Ethics Β 1–5)
|
116 |
|
a) ἔχειν and ἕξις
|
|
b) Presentation of the Context of the Treatment of ἕξις
|
|
c) ἕξις and ἀρετή
|
|
α. The γένεσις of ἀρετή
|
|
β. ἀρετή as μεσότης
|
|
γ. The Orientation of ἀρετή toward the Moment (καιρός)
|
|
§18. Πάθος. Its General Meanings and Its Role in Human Being-There (Metaphysics Δ21, De Anima Α1)
|
129 |
|
a) Ἕξις as Clue to the Conception of the Being-Structure of πάθος
|
|
b) The Four General Meanings of πάθος
|
|
c) Πάθος as the Being-Taken of Human Being-There in Its Full Bodily Being-in-the-World
|
|
d) The Double-Type of Consideration of πάθος according to εἶδος and ὕλη, and the Question Concerning the Task of the φυσικός
|
|
§19. The φυσικός and His Manner of Treating ψυχή (De Part. An. Α 1)
|
140 |
|
a) The Two Types of ἕξις θεωρίας: Concrete Knowledge (ἐπιστήμη)
and Assurance of the Manner of Treatment (παιδεία)
|
|
b) The Decisive παιδεία for Investigating the φύσει γινόμενα: The
οὗ ἕνεκα as λόγος in the Primary Respect
|
|
c) The Determination of Independent λόγος in Relation to φύσει
γινόμενα
|
|
α. The ἔργα τέχνης and the λόγος of τέχνη
|
|
β. The Being-Characters of the φύσει γινόμενα
|
|
γ. Criticism of the Type of Consideration of the Ancient
Physiologists
|
|
d) The Dual Proof of the Restricted Scope of the φυσικός
|
|
α. Indirect Proof
|
|
β. Proof from the Character of Being-Moved Itself
|
|
e) The Definiteness of the History of the Study of Nature by Way
of Truth Itself
|
|
§20. Πάθος as ἡδονή and λύπη (Nicomachean Ethics, Κ1–5)
|
162 |
|
§21. Φόβος (Rhetoric Β 5)
|
167 |
|
a) Schematic Outline of the Characterization of Fear
|
|
b) The Topic, the First Definition, and the First Determinations
|
|
c) The Threatening (φοβερά) and the Encounter-Characters That
Announce (σημεῖα) It
|
|
d) Human Beings Themselves insofar as They Are Frightening
(φοβεροί)
|
|
e) The Genuineness of the Frightening (φοβερόν)
|
|
f) Disposition in Being Afraid
|
|
g) Fear as πίστις: Courage as the Possibility of Being-Composed in
Relation to It: The πάθη as Ground of λόγος
|
|
§22. Supplements to the Explication of Being-There as Being-in-the-World
|
176 |
|
a) The ἕξις of ἀληθεύειν (Nicomachean Ethics Δ12–13)
|
|
b) The World as World of Nature
|
|
§25. The Aristotelian Physics as ἀρχή-Research: Orientation toward the
First Two Books
|
192 |
|
§26. Movement as ἐντελέχεια τοῦ δυνάμει ὄντος (Physics, Γ1)
|
195 |
|
a) Outline of the Chapter
|
|
b) The Role of Fear in ἀρχή-Research
|
|
c) The Topic and What Is Co-Given with It
|
|
d) The Modes of Being from Which Movement Is to Be Apprehended
|
|
α. ἐντελέχεια and ἐνέργεια
|
|
β. στέρησις
|
|
γ. δύναμις
|
|
δ. Being in the Sense of the Categories
|
|
e) Movement as the Being of Beings of the World Itself: Critique
of the Platonic Discourse on the ἀγαθὸν καθόλου (Nicomachean Ethics Α 4).
|
|
f) The διχῶς of the Categories
|
|
g) The First Definition of Movement and Its Illustration
|
|
§27. Movement as ἀόριστον (Physics Γ2)
|
213 |
|
a) Outline of the Chapter
|
|
b) Critique of the Earlier Determination of Movement through
ἑτερότης, ἀνισότης, and μὴ ὄν
|
|
c) The Ground of This Determination: The ἀόριστον of Movement
|
|
d) Movement as ἀτελής in Relation to the ἔργον
|
|
§28. Movement as ἐντελέχεια τοῦ δυνάμει ποιητικοῦ καὶ παθητικοῦ (Physics Γ3)
|
217 |
|
a) Outline of the Chapter
|
|
b) The πρός τι as Character of Being-in-the-World
|
|
c) The Genuine Definition of Movement through ποίησις and πάθησις
|