243
On §24 [359–360]

and gives it a pre-figuring. Here, word, language as possession, inheritance—possibility of abuse, decline.


To take up into “saving” that which is given in advance, the possibility of genuinely cultivating.

This fore as already there (time): the cultivatable possibility in an against-it.

The fore as not yet, the at-the-outset.

The having-”rank-in-advance,” taking-rank-in-advance—ἕξις.

Ἀρχή—λόγος, διάνοια—σοφία, ἐπιστήμη.

To leap across from back there, but in the same possibilities and in beingthere itself. To take up tradition, to question from the proper fore-path.


β) The Genuinely Positive How. The Positive How:
The Possibility For . . .


Being-there: being-in in interpretedness, λόγος -prevalence, δόξα. On the basis of this “seeming,” as prevailing in advance, the positive possibility in relation to this befalling. Not simply out of it—non-sense. Interpretedness in itself, ὑπολήψεις, in terms of raw translucency, genuinely intended. The seizing of the fore-having, fore-sight, fore-grasp, to grasp in interpretedness, cultivating conceptuality.

Πρᾶξις: acting, treating, conferring, debating. Λόγος independent ἀποφαίνεσθαι. Λόγος now μετὰ λόγου for?—Αἴσθησις, νοεῖν, perceiving, looking-out, and delivering what is seen, something as something, in its look, as what, the guiding as-what.

That means: 1. to cultivate fore-having: the being itself, that as that, and it is to be determined, already there, to seize only—appropriation, primary. 2. The cultivation of the guiding as-what, ἀρχή, secure what is foremost. 3. Type of demonstration and of explication: λόγος τοῦ τί ἦν εἶναι, εἶδος “look,” “being-there in its being-from-out-of . . . ,” γένος, presence and producedness, descent from . . .

[?] of the subject-area, leading as-what, from which to determine the beings of the area, in the sense of the prevailing sense of being and the claim of the demonstrating.

1. The independent λόγος in supposing.

2. Supposing itself, ἀληθεύειν, as διά.

3. Interpretation of the possibility of διά, its averageness.

4. The possibility of λόγος καθ’ αὑτό, and therein (in fore-having, foresight, and fore-grasp) of legitimate διανοεῖσθαι in itself, but such that the original as-what that it itself is is exhibited.

Λόγος in νοεῖν, basic mode of discoveredness, supposing perceiving. Νοῦς and καλούμενος νοῦς,62 familiar to everydayness. Νοῦς as διάνοια: διά, supposing


62. De an. Γ 4, 429 a 22.


Basic Concepts of Aristotelian Philosophy (GA 18) by Martin Heidegger

Page generated by BasConAriPhiSteller.EXE