Teacher: From whom, all the same, much can be learned.
Scholar: Certainly ; but what we have called releasement evidently does not mean casting off sinful selfishness and letting self-will go in favor of the divine will.
Teacher: No, not that.
Scientist: In many respects it is clear to me what the word releasement should not signify for us. But at the same time, I know less and less what we are talking about. We are trying to determine the nature of thinking. What has releasement to do with thinking?
Teacher: Nothing if we conceive thinking in the traditional way as re-presenting. Yet perhaps the nature of thinking we are seeking is fixed in releasement.
Scientist: With the best of will, I can not re-present to myself this nature of thinking.
Teacher: Precisely because this will of yours and your mode of thinking as re-presenting prevent it.
Scientist: But then, what in the world am I to do?
Scholar: I am asking myself that too.
Teacher: We are to do nothing; but wait.
Scholar: That is poor consolation.
Teacher: Poor or not, we should not await consolation — something we would still be doing if we became disconsolate. >
Scientist: Then what are we to wait for? And where are we to wait? I hardly know anymore who and where I am.
Teacher: None of us knows that, as soon as we stop fooling ourselves.
Scholar: And yet we still have our path?
Teacher: To be sure. But by forgetting it too quickly we give up thinking.