166
Κοινόν. Out of the History of Beyng [195-197]

master of communism who only apparently has power over himself, yet everywhere the human being is admitted merely as the executor, ossified within what has been his essence hitherto (animal rationale), of that permeating of beings by power by virtue of their malleability. Ever since machination, as the essence of being, has begun to assume the power of sovereignty over beings, "communism" must, initially for the most part in unrecognized disguises, yet relentlessly—because it cannot be stopped by individual beings, and not at all by beings—become the constitution of being pertaining to the world epoch of modernity that is beginning its consummation.

In the empowering of power into machination as its essence, the impetus of power that has been unleashed into the unconditional overflows all resistances, for only what already stands under the dominion of machination is admitted as "real." Since, however, the empowering of the essence of power becomes historical in "communism," it is what drives the expansion and consolidation of the impetus of power into the intolerance that is bereft of every condition. Thoroughly refusing every possession of power on the part of every human effort and presumption, "communism" turns neither to the destinies of the peoples who struggle to assert themselves in the aftermath of the course hitherto taken by history, nor does it heed the strivings, wishes, or convictions of human groups within the peoples, among whom individuals still remain scattered in apparent isolation. Yet even this manner in which the humankind of modernity is swept away into the orbit of machination is only the first, superficial manifestation of the intolerance pertaining to communism, and not yet its essential fury. The reach of the latter will be such that all customary relations to the beings hitherto familiar will be ruptured, in that beings will nowhere offer any longer the support or shelter that they previously granted. Everyday affairs indeed take their course; one indeed becomes accustomed even to the "strange" and to war. Yet amid the appearances cast by an inconspicuousness that is not even heeded, this becoming accustomed confirms the unsettling of beings and of all relations to them under the power of the inhabitual that has apparently been parried. The unsettling unleashed within the intolerance that pertains to "communism" points to a destruction whose empowering belongs to the essence of machination.

With this destruction, whose corrupt essence in machination manifests itself only at certain moments, the inhabitual begins to prepare itself for a transformation of the essence of history for which the replacement of the previous world epoch by a "newest" one can only ever be an ambiguous sign.


Martin Heidegger (GA 69) The History of Beyng