TRANSLATOR'S FOREWARD
1Introduction The Theme and Method of the Lecture Course
1§ 1. Nature and history as domains of objects for the sciences
5§ 2. Prolegomena to a phenomenology of history and nature under the guidance of the history of the concept of time
7§ 3. Outline of the lecture course
Chapter One | Emergence and Initial Breakthrough of Phenomenological Research | 13 |
§ 4. The situation of philosophy in the second half of the 19th century. Philosophy and the sciences
15a) The position of positivism
16b) Neo-Kantianism—the rediscovery of Kant in the philosophy of science
17c) Critique of positivism—Dilthey's call for an independent method for the human sciences
17d) The trivializing of Dilthey's inquiry by Windelband and Rickert
18e) Philosophy as 'scientific philosophy'—psychology as the basic science of philosophy (the theory of consciousness)
19α) Franz Brentano
23β) Edmund Husserl
Chapter Two | The Fundamental Discoveries of Phenomenology, Its Principle, and the Clarification of Its Name | 27 |
§ 5. Intentionality
29a) Intentionality as the structure of lived experiences: exposition and initial elucidation
32b) Rickert's misunderstanding of phenomenology and intentionality
36c) The basic constitution of intentionality as such
37α) The perceived of perceiving: the entity in itself (environmental thing, natural thing, thinghood)
40β) The perceived of perceiving: the how of being-intended (the perceivedness of the entity, the feature of bodily-there)
44γ) Initial indication of the basic mode of intentionality as the belonging-together of intentio and intentum
47§ 6. Categorial intuition
48a) Intentional presuming and intentional fulfillment
48α) Identification as demonstrative fulfillment
50β) Evidence as identifying fulfillment
51γ) Truth as demonstrative identification
53δ) Truth and being
55b) Intuition and expression
56α) Expression of perceptions
60β) Simple and multi-level acts
63c) Acts of synthesis
66d) Acts of ideation
68α) Averting misunderstandings
71β) The significance of this discovery
72§ 7. The original sense of the apriori
75§ 8. The principle of phenomenology
75a) The meaning of the maxim "to the matters themselves"
79b) Phenomenology's understanding of itself as analytic description of intentionality in its apriori
80§ 9. Clarification of the name 'phenomenology'
80a) Clarification of the original sense of the component parts of the name
81α) The original sense of φαινόμενον
84β) Original sense of λόγος (λόγος ἀποφαντικός and λόγος σημαντικός)
85b) Definition of the unified meaning thus obtained and the research corresponding to it
88c) Correcting a few typical misunderstandings of phenomenology which stem from its name
Chapter Three | The Early Development of Phenomenological Research and the Necessity of a Radical Reflection in and from Itself | 90 |
§ 10. Elaboration of the thematic field: the fundamental determination of intentionality
91a) Explication of the demarcation of the thematic field of phenomenology and fixation of the working horizons in Husserl and Scheler
94b) Fundamental reflection upon the regional structure of the field in its originality: elaboration of pure consciousness as an independent region of being
102§ 11. Immanent critique of phenomenological research: critical discussion of the four determinations of pure consciousness
103a) Consciousness is immanent being
104b) Consciousness is absolute being in the sense of absolute givenness
104c) Consciousness is absolutely given in the sense of 'nulla re indiget ad existendum'
106d) Consciousness is pure being
108§ 12. Exposition of the neglect of the question of the being of the intentional as the basic field of phenomenological research
114§ 13. Exposition of the neglect of the question of the sense of being itself and of the being of man in phenomenology
115a) The necessary demarcation of phenomenology from naturalistic psychology, and its overcoming
116b) Dilthey's endeavor of a 'personalistic psychology'—his idea of man as a person
119c) Husserl's adoption of the personalistic tendency in the "Logos-Essay"
123d) Fundamental critique of personalistic psychology on a phenomenological basis
126e) Scheler's unsuccessful attempt in determining the mode of the being of acts and of the performer of acts
128f) Result of the critical reflection: the neglect of the question of being as such and of the being of the intentional is grounded in the fallen ness of Dasein itself
Chapter One | The Phenomenology That Is Grounded in the Question of Being | 135 |
§ 14. Exposition of the question of being from the radically understood sense of the phenomenological principle
138a) Assumption of the tradition as a genuine repetition
139b)
140c)
Chapter Two | Elaboration of the Question of Being in Terms of an Initial Explication of Dasein | 143 |
§ 15. Emergence of the question of being from an indeterminate preunderstanding of Dasein—question of being and understanding of being
144§ 16. Interrogative structure of the question of being
147§ 17. Correlation of the question of being and the questioning entity (Dasein)
Chapter Three | The Most Immediate Explication of Dasein Starting from its Everydayness. The Basic Constitution of Dasein as Being-in-the-World | 151 |
§ 18. Acquisition of the fundamental structures of the basic constitution of Dasein
152a) The Dasein is in the 'to be it at its time'
154b) The Dasein in the 'to be' of everydayness for its particular while
156§ 19. The basic constitution of Dasein as being-in-the-world. The in-being of Dasein and the being-in of things on hand
160§ 20. Knowing as a derivative mode of the in-being of Dasein
167§ 21. Worldhood of the world
167a) World hood as the wherein for Dasein's leeway of encounter
170b) World hood of the environing world: aroundness, the primary character of the space of the "around" as constitutive of world hood
171§ 22. How the tradition passed over the question of the worldhood of the world. Descartes as an example
185§ 23. Positive exposition of the basic structure of the worldhood of the world
186a) Analysis of the characters of encounter of the world (reference, referential totality, familiarity, 'one')
189b) Interpretation of the structure of encounter of the environing world: the phenomenal correlation founding the characters of encounter themselves
191α) The work-world: more detailed phenomenological interpretation of the environing world of concern
193β) Characterization of the specific function of encounter of this work-world for encountering the nearest things in the environing world- the specific character of reality of the handy
198γ) The specific function of encounter of the work-world for letting us encounter that which is always already there—the extant on hand
200c) Determination of the basic structure of world hood as meaningfulness
200α) Misinterpretation of the phenomenon of reference as substance and function
201β) Sense of the structure of encounter belonging to world as meaningfulness
204γ) Interconnection of the phenomena of meaningfulness, sign, reference, and relation
209δ) Being-in-the-world, as concerned and understanding, discloses the world as meaningfulness
214§ 24. Internal structuring of the question of the reality of the external world
214a) The reality of the external world is exempt from any proof of it or belief in it
216b) The reality of the real (worldhood of the world) cannot be defined on the basis of its being an object and being apprehended
218c) Reality is not interpreted by way of the in-itself; rather, this character is itself in need of interpretation
219d) Reality is not to be understood primarily in terms of the bodily presence of the perceived
220e) Reality is not adequately clarified by the phenomenon of resistance as the object of drive and effort
223§ 25. Spatiality of the world
225a) Highlighting of the phenomenal structure of around ness as such is constituted by: remotion, region, orientation (directionality)
227b) The primary spatiality of Dasein itself: remotion, region, orientation are determinations of the being of Dasein as being-in-the-world
234c) Spatializing the environing world and its space—space and extension in mathematical determination using Leibniz as an example
236§ 26. The 'who' of being-in-the-world
237a) Dasein as being-with—the being of others as co-Dasein (critique of the thematic of empathy)
243b) The Anyone as the who of the being of with-one-another in everydayness
Chapter Four | A More Original Explication of In-Being: The Being of Dasein as Care | 251 |
§ 27. In-being and care—an outline
252§ 28. The phenomenon of discoveredness
252a) Structure of the discoveredness of Dasein in its world: disposition
257b) Understanding: the enactment of the being of discoveredness
260c) The cultivation of understanding in interpretation
261d) Discourse and language
265α) Discoursing and hearing
267β) Discoursing and silence
269γ) Discoursing and idle talk
270δ) Discourse and language
272§ 29. Falling as a basic movement of Dasein
272a) Idle talk
274b) Curiosity
278c) Ambiguity
281d) The characters of the inherent movement of falling
282e) The fundamental structures of Dasein from the horizon of fallenness
283§ 30. The structure of uncanniness
283a) The phenomenon of flight and fear
284α) Fear as being afraid of something considered in its four essential moments
287β) The modifications of fear
288γ) Fear in the sense of fearing about
289b) Dread and uncanniness
292c) More original explication of falling and dread (uncanniness) as a preview of the basic constitution of Dasein as care
293§ 31. Care as the being of Dasein
293a) Determination of the articulated structure of care
295b) The phenomena of urge and propensity
297c) Care and discoveredness
299d) Care and the character of the 'before' in understanding and interpretation (prepossession, preview, preconception)
301e) The 'Fable of Cura' as an illustration of an original self-interpretation of Dasein
303f) Care and intentionality
§ 32. The result and the task of the fundamental analysis of Dasein: elaboration of the question of being itself
307§ 33. Necessity for the thematic development of the phenomenological interpretation of Dasein as a whole. The phenomenon of death
312§ 34. Phenomenological interpretation of death as a phenomenon of Dasein
315a) The utmost possibility of death in the mode of being of everydayness
317b) The authentic relationship of the being of Dasein toward death
318§ 35. The phenomenon of willing to have a conscience and of being guilty
319§ 36. Time as the being in which Dasein can be its totality