Thinking gods and speaking of them already requires inabiding a fundamental knowing-awareness. This thinking and this speaking do not require certainty which, as such, lies outside the fundamental claims of fundamental knowing-awareness. For, every certainty is always only the additionally reckonable warranty in accord with which the 'not-knower' at first consents to accept Mknowingw and its advocacy. The fundamental knowing-awareness is unwaveringly steadfast in the revering inquiry, which, as a consequence of incertitude, is usually merely mistrusted. The strength for revering the most question-worthy arises out of an unsettling dismay, that is, out of the grounding-attunement that displaces man unto the freedom towards all mere beings and surrounds him with the abground-dimension of be-ing. Allotted to be-ing, a being can endure only as a being that belongs to this allotment when in the unsettling dismay this being is capable of honoring the abground which prevails only in a 'revering-turning' that turns to the grounding of the truth of the hidden-sheltered ground. And this unwavering 'turning unto' is the inquiry into the most question-worthy. Considered calculatively, this uncertain Mcertaintyw lies beyond the reach of any science. The fundamental knowing-awareness can never become confused and gloomy through the kind of mania resulting from a mere intellectual zeal that is associated with 'world-views'.
Specifically, this knowing-awareness inquires into three possibilities